Well, the second semester is about to get over. Had a few more teachers this time. Some caused even more nuisance, some were understanding. Some knew their subject well, some didn't know a shit about that. Maybe this is the right time to put forth my views on them. After all, here comes another extended week in Thapar University.
This semester consists of 6 subjects, which are
This semester consists of 6 subjects, which are
- Computer Programming II: Java(UTA009)
- Mathematics II(UMA04)
- Electrical Engineering(UEE001)
- Applied Physics(UPH004)
- Engineering Design I(UTA008)
- Professional Communication(UHU003)
Computer Programming II: Java - UTA009
Lectures: Mr Vinay Arora(VIN) One great guy in the semester. A good teacher must have subject knowledge, communication skills, and must be able to inculcate the interest of students in the subject. He is one who actually does possess all three of these qualities. He is one person who actually doesn't give a shit about what the attendance is. What he cares about is if you are clear with the concepts or not. He won't stick to the syllabus, he surely moves ahead and teaches us what will be useful for the real programming. You know how they say that a teacher deserves respect? He is one of those who really do. He ensures that all your queries are cleared, by hook or by crook. He does have contacts in the industry also. Moreover, he doesn't shy off to admit that he doesn't know something. I must confess that when the semester started, I had harsh feelings for him. But as time passed, he proved to be worthy of the much sought after respect. He is just slow, and he has to do that to take the whole class into account. Otherwise, he is one of the finest faculty members in Thapar University as I have seen.
Practicals: Mr Vinay Gautam(VG): Same first name, but totally opposite traits. He is a senseless and not at all understanding teacher in Thapar University. He knows neither his syllabus, nor does he know the fact that students are not his slaves. He is the epitome of nuisance anyone can cause in college. There is an incident that I feel bound to share, after which you will yourself identify who is right and who is wrong.
We have a Reading Week to prepare for Exams and to give Lab Evaluations/Quizzes and other such tests. Now, the coordinator of Java said that the Lab Evaluations must be conducted in the Reading Week only, during the lab timings of the respective batches. Everything was absolutely fine, till we realised that this is the mid of the week and it will hamper us in going home. So I approached this guy to reschedule the Lab Evaluations to some other day, probably after the MST. Now he is one person who won't bulge. He finally agreed to schedule the same on Friday, saving us of 2 days. It seemed to be a fair deal, and then he sent me to check if the labs are available. I checked, and called him up to tell that one lab was available. He agreed then. Seems good till now.
What happened after this is going to show the limit of severity of this. He did not turn up on Friday for the Lab Evaluation, we were all sitting in the Lab. After 45 minutes, after the Lab Assistant requested us, we left the lab. In these 45 minutes, I had called him multiple times, of which he picked up the call twice. Once he said that he will be there, and the second time he said that the lab evaluation was scheduled for 4:00 PM. After that, when I reminded him of the right time, he disconnected the call.
Then our Mid Semester tests started. On the day of my 3rd MST, Physics, this guy crossed paths with me and what he said is unbelievable. He asked where we were during the Lab Evaluation. WTF! I told him that we were in the lab. After some minutes of repeating the same dialogue, coupled with him saying that we weren't there, he asked which lab we were in. I told him the lab, and the same dialogue followed. All of a sudden, he remembers to ask when we had our lab evaluation. Friday 1:00PM, I answered. Now he starts. He says that we had the evaluation on Wednesday, and when I reminded him of the talk we had, he denied being involved in any such talks. Man, he said that he would mark everyone absent.
Imagine, this level of rubbish happening just before the most difficult MST of the Semester. After that, I tried to ignore his bullshit and gave my exam. Had the next exam for communication, decided I would talk to him after that. Fate had something else in store, he was my invigilator for the communication exam. What worse could things go? Actually there is a whole new level of Bullshit to come.
After the exam, I had a word with him and he scheduled the fuckin lab evaluation in between the MST. Not after them, not before them. A notice of 24hrs and the lab evaluation is to be conducted. Insane, really. And since he had reported the incident as a Mass Bunk, we had no choice but to go for the evaluation. His claim at all times was that he did not send an SMS regarding the reschedule of the Evaluation. Till date, I have never had to wait for an SMS, a word of mouth is sufficient to be relied upon. He never even informed that he would be sending an SMS to confirm. Like we knew it already.
After all this, I leave it to you to decide if he is worth giving respect or not...
Mathematics II - UMA004
Lectures + Tutorials: Ms Nishu Jain(NF4) If Pramod Vaishnav was not enough, we have her here. She doesn't know a shit about her subject except a few shitty formulae. Life would have been simpler if she hadn't appeared ever.All she did in the class was to make us write down formulae, that too reading from her notes. It's like, 'you had one job'... And then we have her legendary 'yes do it'. Her words for 5 continuous minutes are sure to include this at least once, this is the frequency of these words. Without explaining a shit about the concepts involved, she starts off with this.
Basically, she doesn't know her subject and she doesn't know how to teach also. I fail to understand on what basis she was hired in the first place.
I have also decided that on a personal level, I shall be awarding faculty members with certain awards. That shall follow in a post soon.
Basically, she doesn't know her subject and she doesn't know how to teach also. I fail to understand on what basis she was hired in the first place.
Electrical Engineering - UEE001
Lectures + Tutorials + Practicals: Ms Navdeep Kaur(NK) Would not be right to say that she knows her subject and even more wrong to say that she doesn't. Her knowledge is governed to an unprecedented extent by the topic. Though this is not the sign of a very good teacher, she does qualify to be in the list of good faculty members of Thapar University. This should be enough to give an idea of the quality here.
Anyways, what happens is that she is somewhat understanding with the students, but when the limit is crossed she actually goes to the peak of being an irritating teacher. Another major problem is that she tries to communicate in English and struggles with the same. This increases the communication gap between her and the students, therefore making her lectures even less worth attending.
Anyways, what happens is that she is somewhat understanding with the students, but when the limit is crossed she actually goes to the peak of being an irritating teacher. Another major problem is that she tries to communicate in English and struggles with the same. This increases the communication gap between her and the students, therefore making her lectures even less worth attending.
Applied Physics - UPH004
Lectures: Ms Gudween Kaur(GDS) I think she deserves the tag of the most useless lecturer in the second semester of Thapar University. She has a page, and she will literally read from it and simultaneously write down the same on the board. Then she will read it out again when you ask her to explain the same. If you say that you didn't understand or you ask any doubt, yes you guessed it right. She will read out from the same paper again!
It is all like the same part of lecture is being played again and again on repeat mode. Then what happens is that she tends to ask questions in the beginning of every lecture. Tell me one thing, are we in School? I really thought I had joined a college, where you won't treat me like a primary wing kid anymore. Seemingly, I was totally wrong.
Tutorials: Dr Sunil Devi Well, it won't be wrong to say that she is wrong on some levels. She knows her subject and she also knows how to teach. But her classes are boring as fuck. She doesn't involve the students, and the tutorials were very monotonous in the whole semester.
Even after this, they did teach us something; this was the task lectures failed in completely. She is also very formal, and hence the students haven't been able to open up with her. Doesn't seem good, but not everything that happens in good.
Practicals: Ms Shivani Jindal Was she even present in the lab sessions? I saw her but she was dominated by some other instructor. Actually in the Physics labs, we have two Teaching Assistants rather than one. The second one was Ms Kamaldeep Kaur who was the dominating person in the whole lab. This one was irritating to the core, she never co-operated with the students.
I understand that teachers are not required to co-operate with the students, but this is something which will do some good only. She actually considered herself a power over us, something like Mr Vinay Gautam (UTA009). This is what made the lab sessions a hard time in the week.
Engineering Design I - UTA008
Lectures + Tutorials + Practicals: Dr Deepa Mudgal(DMG) A fine person who understands her students and actually knows about her subject. She understood the fact that there are times when we are all tired and she actually used to suspend the lectures at that time. Feels bad that she wasn't in some better subject, otherwise things would have been much better.
Professional Communication - UHU003
Lectures: Dr Diksha Sharma(DKS) On the primer face, she was an irritating person who was very formal to actually be able to understand our concerns. But it turns out that this was a cover on her face for the lectures, just to keep the class under control. She was very formal as long as lectures are concerned, and otherwise she was an understanding person. Any illogical decisions she gave were actually based on miscommunications and she took measures to correct them as soon as the facts were brought to her notice.
Though she was never able to make the lectures interesting, she did earn some amount of respect.
Tutorials: Ms Navdeep Dhillon(NAV) She was another calm and approachable person. For the whole semester, she has not lost her cool on anything which was acceptable. She analyzed the situation well, and measured progress rather than absolute performance. This is actually what is expected for internal evaluations, though most teachers fail to do so.
Though she was never able to make the lectures interesting, she did earn some amount of respect.
Tutorials: Ms Navdeep Dhillon(NAV) She was another calm and approachable person. For the whole semester, she has not lost her cool on anything which was acceptable. She analyzed the situation well, and measured progress rather than absolute performance. This is actually what is expected for internal evaluations, though most teachers fail to do so.
Another Interaction - Dr Maninder Singh
Dr Maninder Singh is the current head of the Computer Science and Engineering Department and my mentor for the 4 years of my study at Thapar University, Patiala. He is very cool and approachable as a person, and he tends to analyze things logically rather than on the basis of power. This is something which comes as an inherent characteristic when you interact with computers more than humans for years together.
The question comes that why I interacted with him. Well, I have described an incident with Mr Vinay Gautam(UTA009) earlier in this Blog Post. Actually, we did approach Dr Maninder Singh regarding the unfair means which an instructor was adopting because of his designation. We actually wanted to bring to his notice that even such activities are happening in his department.
The way he handled the situation is commendable. It is indeed noteworthy that he listened to all of our side of the story patiently, and since he was busy at the instant he decided that he would have a word with Mr Vinay Gautam later. He asked someone in the CSED office to take a note of the problem and assured us that the issue will be addressed satisfactorily by Monday (this interaction with him took place on Thursday)
Sure enough, he was true to his word. On Monday, I had a WhatsApp message from Mr Vinay Gautam asking for my E-Mail Address very desperately. I know the level of desperation was very high as he was unable to wait for a minute before calling me up. I was, unfortunately, in a lecture at that time so I couldn't receive the call. But I did share my E-Mail Address on WhatsApp.
No sooner, I got a mail from him that the Re-Evaluation for the MST Lab shall be conducted on Wednesday. In fact, I noticed that a cc of the mail had been sent to the Head of CSED as well.
This was the strictness Dr Maninder Singh dealt the issue with. It is important to note that Mr Vinay Gautam didn't stop here. He actually tried to ask us in the Lab who exactly approached sir. Probably he wanted to cut some marks. The unity of Q1 stands till date, and he didn't get his answer. He had to mark us with good scores, probably it was a part of the instructions given to him.
Till date, he did not dare to mess with us again. Hope he stays calm and in his limits...
I have also decided that on a personal level, I shall be awarding faculty members with certain awards. That shall follow in a post soon.